HomeHadoopPolyBase explained

Comments

PolyBase explained — 26 Comments

  1. I watched the joint Hortonworks and Microsoft webinar a few days ago on how PDW has incorporated Hortonworks. When they got to the section where the presenter showed how a user can easily join existing PDW data with Hadoop Hive/HCatalog tables it was impressive. Really the future of how easy it will be to merge unstructured data in Hadoop with traditionally structured data. Now, how soon will we be able to get that with the basic SQL Server BI stack?

  2. Pingback:Introduction to Hadoop - SQL Server - SQL Server - Toad World

  3. Pingback:Introduction to Hadoop | James Serra's Blog

  4. Pingback:What is HDInsight? | James Serra's Blog

  5. Pingback:Parallel Data Warehouse (PDW) benefits made simple | James Serra's Blog

  6. Pingback:Parallel Data Warehouse (PDW) benefits made simple - SQL Server - SQL Server - Toad World

  7. Pingback:Parallel Data Warehouse (PDW) AU1 released - SQL Server - SQL Server - Toad World

  8. Pingback:What is the Microsoft Analytics Platform System (APS)? - SQL Server - SQL Server - Toad World

  9. Pingback:Non-obvious APS/PDW benefits - SQL Server - SQL Server - Toad World

  10. Pingback:Non-obvious APS/PDW benefits | James Serra's Blog

  11. Pingback:The Modern Data Warehouse - SQL Server - SQL Server - Toad World

  12. Pingback:The Modern Data Warehouse | James Serra's Blog

  13. Pingback:Hadoop and Data Warehouses | James Serra's Blog

  14. Pingback:What is a data lake? - SQL Server - SQL Server - Toad World

  15. Pingback:Azure SQL Data Warehouse | James Serra's Blog

  16. Pingback:Azure SQL Data Warehouse - SQL Server - SQL Server - Toad World

  17. Pingback:What is a data lake? | James Serra's Blog

  18. Pingback:Azure Data Lake | James Serra's Blog

  19. Pingback:Azure Data Lake - SQL Server - SQL Server - Toad World

  20. Pingback:SQL Server 2016 public preview arriving this summer - SQL Server - SQL Server - Toad World

  21. We have determined in our product/solution to revise the existing strategy and architecture as far as data is concerned. We have come to the point where we needed a common gateway or endpoint where structured and unstructured data can seamlessly be accessible and can be homogenized. Our backend data processing are all HADOOP based infrastructure and our OLTP/DWH database are currently under SQL SERVER 2008 R2 platform. According to our research, the new version of SQL SERVER and that is SQL SERVER 2014, offers a specific feature that is suitable to our requirements. The specific feature that we are looking at is the “POLYBASE”. Our main objective for the re-achitecuring are as follows: 1. Very minimal to zero revisions/impacts to our front-end application; 2. Optimal performance gain in accessing (including data manipulation) data for both structured/unstructured; 3. Scalability and maintainability; 4. Re-utilization of an existing skillset; What we are looking at or expectation: 1. Some success stories implementing such feature and if need be some presentation; 2. Provide and guide us in the implementation of such feature; 3. Any other feature as an extension of SQL Server to Hadoop.

  22. Pingback:SQL Server 2016 public preview arriving this summer | James Serra's Blog

  23. This is a follow-up to my first comment. We’ll, it appears that PolyBase will be coming to the enterprise edition of SQL Server 2016. I’ve reviewed CTP 2.2 and PolyBase is a big part of CTP 2.2. This is great news. If anyone is interested, I’ve created a series of posts on how to setup, and get started with PolyBase in SQL Server 2016.
    You can find the posts here: http://realizeddesign.blogspot.com/

  24. Hi Sir,

    Great article sir, I have been waiting for this kind of stuff, which can help us to fetch data from hadoop without MR,Yarn,PIG,HIVE etc.
    Thank you for posting

  25. Pingback:Why use a data lake? - SQL Server - SQL Server - Toad World

  26. Pingback:Why use a data lake? | James Serra's Blog

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>